When it comes to the Dani Mathers鈥 case, we鈥檝e heard plenty from Mathers herself. The 30-year-old playmate who posted a now infamous photo of a fellow, 70-year-old gym-goer in the buff to Snapchat along with some rather harsh words about her physique (鈥淚f I can鈥檛 unsee this then you can鈥檛 either鈥) nearly a year ago, has been facing the social and legal fallout of her actions ever since.

The model responded to the backlash almost immediately following the incident, taking to Snapchat shortly after posting the initial photo to say that she had uploaded the pic, which was meant for a friend, by accident. She also broke down on Good Morning America recently, telling the hosts that the situation had left her feeling 鈥渞eally low鈥 and that she herself had become a victim of privacy invasion following the incident. 鈥淚 had lost my privacy after taking the privacy of someone else,鈥 she explained.

Yet while we鈥檝e now learned her legal fate 鈥 Mathers was sentenced to 30 days of community service, $60 restitution, and 36 months of summary probation after being charged with misdemeanor invasion of privacy 鈥 we鈥檝e still yet to hear from the other party involved: Mathers鈥 photo victim.

City Attorney Mike Feuer spoke with the woman in question, who has chosen to keep her identity private following the ordeal, about her feelings regarding the case, and shared them with the LA Times.

According to Feuer, the unnamed woman is understandably 鈥渉umiliated,鈥 and was taken aback at Mathers鈥 tearful television appearance, during which she also claimed to have reached out to the victim. 鈥淚 will share with you, that surprises the victim, who told me she is unaware of any attempt by Ms. Mathers to reach out to her,鈥 Feuer said.

The attorney also revealed that the victim was just as happy as Mathers likely was that the case didn鈥檛 end up going to trial. 鈥淪he鈥檚 relieved that she didn鈥檛 have to endure a trial and testify, but she was willing to do so,鈥 he said. 鈥淪he wishes the whole chapter, this painful chapter, would close 鈥 the impact of the photograph being taken and disseminated and what that鈥檚 meant to her as well as what it鈥檚 meant to hear Ms. Mathers be held accountable for what she did.鈥

As for Mathers鈥 sentence, which some were quick to criticize, saying it was little more than a slap on the wrist, Feuer said he sees it in a rather different light. 鈥淭he term 鈥榗ommunity service鈥 really misstates what鈥檚 going on here,鈥 he said. 鈥淭his is community labor. This is not a glamorous star turn someplace. This is erasing graffiti on the street. And I think that, combined with restitution (the victim had requested $60 to replace a backpack that was seen in the photo that she felt might identify her), combined with the probationary terms here, which are fairly extensive, taken together is an appropriate sentence,鈥 he said.

Still, he says the victim鈥檚 courage in pressing charges will have a meaningful impact on future cases to come. 鈥淪he鈥檚 very modest, very humble about that, and disclaimed any credit that she might have for having what it takes to have this seen through,鈥 he said.

Ultimately, Feuer said that when it comes to the victim, however, 鈥淭he impact of this incident is irreparable. And it causes harm that will reverberate on and on鈥 I think there鈥檚 no question that in this case, the invasion of her privacy, compounded by the dissemination of the photo that was taken, has had what I hope will be a dissipating impact over time but certainly a severe impact now.鈥

Here鈥檚 to wishing her all the best in her journey to self-healing.

Do you think Dani has paid her dues? Let us know over @BritandCo.

(h/t Cosmopolitan; Photos via Frederick M. Brown/Getty)