One frustrating thing for many people聽following the presidential campaign (and all politics, really) is that the issues closest to their聽hearts might not be the ones getting attention. If you鈥檙e attentive to economic inequality聽or overwhelmed by your student loans, this campaign cycle has probably been the best one in recent memory. And聽environmental issues and election issues for moms聽have gotten some play,聽but perhaps not as much as they should. What other topics are candidates skipping over?

The best way to find out what people want to know more about is to ask them, so that鈥檚 what we鈥檝e done. We found three women who are owners or founders of companies, as well as an amazing engineering professor, to tell us in their own words what they think the presidential candidates need to address.

Screenshot 2016-04-19 13.55.40

1. Courtney Pilgrim, artist, art teacher and founder of,聽on education: 鈥淏eing a former educator at an inner city school 鈥 a title one school at that (where at least 40 percent of students qualify for free lunch) 鈥 the state of education in this country is the most important thing to me. And something I wish more people, especially our presidential candidates, cared more about.

I feel like if we could improve our education system for students, teachers and parents it would trickle down and solve a lot of our other social and economic problems. Knowledge is power, right?鈥

Heather Lipner

2. Heather Lipner, founder of Clashist and Drawsta,聽on government transparency: 鈥淚 believe we should be talking about being more operationally efficient by investing in information technology and communications, and being more transparent so people can understand [issues] and be engaged.

Where does all the money go? It鈥檚 really easy for me to stay up-to-date on environmental issues, women鈥檚 issues and international politics, but government websites are a total mess, from trying to find a local post office that files passports to understanding Obamacare. Why isn鈥檛 there an interactive map so we can all follow along nationally, by state and city, to see what gets funded and its overall successes and failures?鈥


3. Arianna Orland, design consultant, owner聽of Paper Jam Press,聽on cities of the future: 鈥淚 wish the presidential candidates were discussing how to build cities for the future that people care about, cities with public spaces and public art and places for artists to live and create. The world needs artists, it鈥檚 through their work that we鈥檙e able to connect more deeply to the world around us and each other.鈥

Debbie Chachra

4. Debbie Chachra, associate professor of materials science at Olin College of Engineering, on research funding: 鈥淐andidates and politicians like to talk about innovation as being a key to economic success in the US, but this innovation rests on a foundation of basic research. Dr. Mariana Mazzucato of the University of Sussex has argued compellingly that the federal government is essential for funding basic research, because it can amortize risk in a way that private companies can鈥檛 match, laying the groundwork for new technologies that then get used in commercial products, like the iPhone.

But basic research by companies has been in decline for the last half-century, and federal funding for basic research has聽fallen or stayed flat since 2010. So, I want to hear the candidates talk about putting federal money where their mouth is. If we really want the US to be a leader in innovation, we need to invest money in basic research to keep a pipeline of new technologies flowing. (Note: I can鈥檛 vote, but I am a permanent resident of the US, which means I pay taxes and I also get National Science Foundation funding.)鈥

聽What topics do you want to hear the candidates talk about? Tweet us your thoughts @BritandCo!

(Featured photo via Getty)