Up until now, three things were certain in this world: death, taxes and time zones. We鈥檙e pretty solid on the first two (sorry!), but as for the third, times may be about to change (pun intended). This Sunday, we observed Daylight Savings once again. Some states have already abandoned DST (looking at you, Arizona), and many others argue that the practice is antiquated and simply not efficient. Science historian and writer James Gleick wrote an op-ed recently in The New York Times to eschew time zones. 鈥淭he time-zone map is a hodgepodge 鈥 a jigsaw puzzle by Dal铆. Logically you might assume there are 24, one per hour,鈥 he writes. 鈥淵ou would be wrong. There are 39, crossing and overlapping, defying the sun, some offset by 30 minutes or even 45, and fluctuating on the whims of local satraps.鈥

Young woman reaching for alarm clock

The TL;DR version is that Gleick argues we should all observe something called 鈥淓arth time.鈥 When it鈥檚 noon in London, it should be 12 in Los Angeles. While that would mean you would probably be eating breakfast at 5pm, the only real adjustment would be in numbers. And it would be a lot easier to figure out what time it is somewhere else, because it would be the same time everywhere. The sun would just be in a different spot in the sky.

It seems super weird at first glance, we know. But we could definitely get behind this movement. Time zones are silly anyway. They just make everything confusing. And the less confusion, the better.

What do you think of 鈥淓arth time?鈥 Let us know @BritandCo!

(h/t Slashdot, photos via Getty)