As we watch JoJo Fletcher struggle to choose a potential mate amidst professional hipsters and erectile dysfunction specialists on The Bachelorette and mourn the loss of the couple formerly known as Tayvin, we can鈥檛 help but wonder: Where CAN one find love nowadays? As it turns out, it鈥檚 not where you might think.

love

Contrary to what most might believe, the answer doesn鈥檛 lie in the big city: At least, not according to a new study released by dating site Badoo, who offered up a ranking of the best and worst cities to be single in. Their findings suggest that when it comes to being single, more people don鈥檛 necessarily mean better odds when it comes to finding true love. In fact, the Big Apple was among the worst places to find a mate.

According to the site鈥檚 spokesperson, Joey Hadfield, 鈥淢assively dense cities across the United States have a lower percentage of singles.鈥 What鈥檚 more, he said that company is 鈥渘oticing that rural areas tend to pose a greater potential for singles to meet a potential mate.鈥 That鈥檚 a head-scratcher if we ever heard one.聽Even more jaw-dropping is the city that made the top of the list 鈥 Norfolk, VIRGINIA. Who would鈥檝e thunk?聽Check out what other cities made the cut below.

DATING

BEST CITIES TO BE SINGLE

1. Norfolk, Virgina

2. Chandler, Arizona

3. Colorado Springs, Colorado

4. Glendale, Arizona

5. Akron, Ohio

WORST CITIES TO BE SINGLE

1. New York City, New York

2. Miami, Florida

3. San Francisco, California

4. Houston, Texas

5. Laredo, Texas

Did your city make the best list or the worst list? Let us know over聽@BritandCo!

(h/t Refinery29, photos via Getty)