More than 40 years after the release of the original TV series, Wonder Woman premiered last night to much fanfare, with its star Gal Gadot walking the superhero blue carpet in a glitzy red halter dress with stunning cutouts. She wasn鈥檛 the only heroine in attendance, either: Her predecessor, Lynda Carter, was also on hand to celebrate the flick鈥檚 release, smiling wide as she posed for photos with Gadot.

鈥淲onderful (see what I did there?) to be with the lovely @gal_gadot at the world premiere of Wonder Woman!鈥 Carter wrote on Instagram.

And yet, it wasn鈥檛 who was seen at the film鈥檚 Hollywood screening, however, but who *wouldn鈥檛* be joining in on the fun at a separate, upcoming release event that seemed to make the biggest splash. A female-only viewing of the film has been set for June 6 at a theater called the Alamo Drafthouse Cinema in Austin, Texas, and the fellas? They ain鈥檛 too happy.

The theater has invited women ages 18 and up (six and up with an adult) to join them for a no-guys-allowed night at the movies. 鈥淎pologies, gentleman, but we鈥檙e embracing our girl power鈥nd when we say 鈥楶eople who identify as women only,鈥 we mean it. Everyone working at this screening 鈥 venue staff, projectionist, and culinary team 鈥 will be female,鈥 read the site.

The thought was too much for some to bear, with men reportedly flooding the cinema鈥檚 social media pages to express their anger.

The fact remains, however, that this doesn鈥檛 just come down to a screening for many, but a larger issue of gender identity. Wonder Woman鈥榮 big screen debut 鈥 nearly 80 years after her introduction to the world 鈥 has been a long time coming, particularly with a new superhero film being churned out what seems like every six months. What the heck took so long to get her story made? 鈥淪ince 1920, there have been about 130 superhero and comic book films with solo protagonists in the United States, both on the big and small screens,鈥 wrote Gizmodo, adding, 鈥淒o you know how many of those 130 films had female leads? Eight.鈥

What鈥檚 more, as many have pointed out, it鈥檚 also the first time a superhero film was directed by a woman since 2008, when Lexi Alexander took on Punisher: War Zone, making it an even bigger historical event for women in cinema.

Then, there are those who argue that there is big difference between private women-only spaces of safety and shared feminism, and publicly discriminatory practices. After all, as The Guardian鈥檚 Naomi Wolf wrote, 鈥淔eminism in the 1970s was based on the truism that every woman 鈥榥eeded a room of one鈥檚 own.鈥欌 She goes on to express that 鈥渢here are still breakthroughs in skills acquisition, learning, and leadership that happen in women-only settings,鈥 while also noting that the same has been said of male-only settings.

She鈥檚 not alone in her viewpoint. As one man (yes, man 鈥 not all feminists are women!), wrote on Twitter, 鈥淭his isn鈥檛 inequality. This is a business giving back to a demographic who has been largely sh*t upon by our culture for a significant amount of our shared history.鈥

The theater, for its part, isn鈥檛 backing down, not only trolling angry commenters, but adding a second screening of the event in response (which, like the first, sold out). They also announced plans to take the idea nationwide.

Catch the flick on the big screen on June 2.

What鈥檚 your take on a women-only Wonder Woman screening? Tell us over @BritandCo.

(h/t Hollywood Reporter; Photos via Alberto E. Rodriguez + James Alt/Getty)