How Republican Andria Tupola Made the Switch From Music Teacher to House Minority Leader

Women Who Run highlights female political candidates on both sides of the aisle who are poised to change the face of local, state, and federal government for the better.

Andria Tupola never planned on a career in anything remotely tied to politics. In fact, the native Hawaiian is a former music teacher who is currently in the process of finishing her PhD in music education. But that hasn’t stopped her from serving two terms representing the 43rd District in the Hawaii House of Representatives, being the first Samoan/Hawaiian woman to serve as the House Minority Leader, and aiming for the top in hopes of becoming the next governor.

Coming from an unconventional background and being a political outsider are both assets, she says. It’s a reminder that anyone can run for office and make changes in their local communities.

“Whether people agree or don’t agree, the best part is that we can change it!” she says. “If you don’t like something, then you can voice your concerns, you can run for office, you can suggest amendments. As you know, there have been lots of changes to the constitution from various amendments that have been brought forth. I just like that there’s a guideline that we can all agree to abide by, and if we want to change it, there’s a process to do that.”

As a Republican running in a Democratic-leaning state, she embraces the challenge of redefining the term “Republican” and pushing Hawaii into more of a two-party system.

“Being a Republican has stimulated a lot of conversation,” she says. “I believe in this state. It’s opened their mind to what a Republican could be. I’m younger, I’m 37, I’m a mom running for governor for the state of Hawaii. For me, the opportunity that opens up is that people can get involved at a younger age. And two, people can get involved even if they have family obligations — it’s still possible to do something like this.”

B+C: What originally inspired you to run for office?

Tupola: It was definitely my time in Venezuela. I lived there from 2003 to 2004, I was 23 years old, and I learned a lot about different philosophies of government and how it can impact and affect an entire society. When I got back from Venezuela, I was just very grateful for the freedoms that we have, especially the opportunities to participate in government. Not just in voting, but we have a greater opportunity in this country where you can run for political office to impact change.

So, I came back and I was more cynically minded than I’ve ever been in my life of different issues and philosophies that they have in Venezuela — that they have built a people that was entirely dependent on the government. I started to frame my own philosophy about leadership: that the government should be here to empower us and to help us to take ownership, but that we should never become totally reliant on the government. As you can see in Venezuela, it just didn’t end up well for them. If you go too far to that side of the pendulum, nobody can sustain an entire country, paying for their medical, their education, their housing. That was probably the one thing that got me involved.

After that experience, I came back, finished my degree, and in 2012, that was the first time I started to help candidates. I campaigned for my first candidate that year [Mitt Romney]. I didn’t even know anything about anything — I didn’t even know the difference between the political parties — I just got out and helped because I wanted to see candidates empower their communities and utilize philosophies that can help citizens become more self-reliant.

B+C: What was it about the philosophies of the Republican party that you were drawn to?

Tupola: I really support local businesses, being more mindful of how the economy can play a big role in empowerment. In supporting local businesses, you really do help the economy to flow because you’re not only creating jobs but you’re getting more within the local community. I’m a very community-minded person, so I do believe that even in Hawaii when you talk about business, there really are no large businesses here. Every business in Hawaii is a small business. If we don’t help and support them, we don’t have an economy here.

I appreciate the stance the party takes on supporting the constitution. One thing that took me aback when I was in Venezuela was just the amount of lawlessness. Everywhere I went, people would tell me that the law was there, but it was just a suggestion. Just the chaoticness of living through that really made me grateful for a base foundation on what this country was founded on. Small government; the less government in our lives, the better. Supporting local businesses, making sure to uphold the laws that we have in place now.

B+C: How did you make that transition?

Tupola: I was a missionary for my church. When I got back from Venezuela, I graduated in 2005 with my bachelor’s in music and then I finished my masters in music in 2011. So my track my whole life was to be a music teacher. I absolutely did not want to get into politics; I just wanted to finish my music career and become a music professor — which I did! It’s just that I stepped away to do this. It’s not a joke. Going from a field of music education into politics is like living in Japan. I don’t understand the terms; sometimes the word and the procedures confuse me. So, the past four years of being a legislator have been harder than getting my PhD. Getting a doctorate degree in a field that you know is easy. But stepping into the world of politics and having to become competent on thousands of issues, that is hard. I have to have a stance about what I think about the second amendment, what I think about the Affordable Care Act […] I’ve sat on eight different committees as a legislator — finance committee, public safety, transportation, labor, higher ed, education, health, human services — and I’ve never learned so much different content in such a short period of time.

B+C: What are the main issues you’ll fight if you win?

Tupola: I have to do something about the cost of living. There’s no question in my mind that it’s the most important thing we have to do for our state right now. We are facing such a huge outflux of people leaving Hawaii, local families determining they can’t live here anymore because it’s too expensive, local businesses determining if they can even keep their doors open. There are native Hawaiians that haven’t got housing. There is a huge issue here that we’re not addressing and that is: How do we really [make] the cost of living [affordable] so that local families can go on living here? In conjunction with the cost of living, you have to talk about housing. We have a really bad issue with bringing in developers to build housing that is not for local families, where the median price of a home is like a million dollars. There needs to be more support for local developers, being mindful of the population, and making sure that we have more options for affordable housing.

B+C: Wouldn’t that require more government intervention in terms of regulation?

Tupola: No, that requires the government getting the heck out of the way. Right now, just to build anything like a wall or structure, the average time is 17 months to get a permit. I just met with one of my constituents who can’t get a permit to add an additional room onto his house for his daughter who can’t afford housing. The city won’t give him the permit because they can’t tell how much weight the bridge next to the house can hold, and if we don’t know the weight of the bridge, then we can’t determine if a fire truck can go through it. And if the fire truck can’t go through it, then in the event of a fire, it can’t get put out — it is just so ridiculous. I called the fire chief and I’m like, are we really talking about the weight of the bridge? Our permitting process is a bureaucratic layer of mess of seven different things that you have to get through.

It’s all for safety, but the lag time to get this done and the cost incurred is one of the biggest problems. The delay of permitting increases the cost of your project and your labor. If you have guys waiting on the line, they’re getting laid off. […] These people are losing jobs, their families are going on unemployment and food stamps because they can’t afford to eat because a piece of paper isn’t getting signed. […] All of this is due to government unnecessary regulation with a million steps and 10 people, and everyone has a different view of what needs to [be done to] complete step A and B. If these guys don’t have a legislator like me that sticks my hand in the problem and does it, these are just regular people who don’t know what to do with an incompetent government. We need to make decisions like first responders because these decisions absolutely affect local people’s lives.

B+C: What has posed some of the biggest challenges in your campaign so far?

Tupola: It’s always gotta be hard to raise money. When I ran the first time, it was difficult. My first race, I raised $56,000 and people were like, “Holy smokes! How did you do that?” and it wasn’t easy, I’ll tell you that much. The second race, I raised almost $70,000, and this race, we’re up to $400,000 right now. But it’s a statewide race. I’m running banners, but some of these guys who run for statewide races, they’re dropping like a million dollars. We just bought some radio ads for $1,700 here, $2,000 there. It’s always a challenge, but it’s good because it keeps our campaign humble, very grassroots-oriented. There’s nothing fancy about the way that I do things; we just get out there and do the work.

B+C: Politics are always a spectrum. Where do you see yourself fitting within the modern Republican party?

Tupola: I would say that everyone has a different perspective of what a Republican is, and I think obviously there’s a lot of stigma toward the Republican party, but at the end of the day, there’s not one person that defines what a Republican is. So I believe that one of the things our party is known for is embracing diversity of thought. In this last presidential election, there were maybe 10 candidates running for president. There were all these people running because there’s so much diversity of thought of where the Republican party thinks the country should go.

So I always remind people that whenever you’re part of a group, there’s never one continuous word or description of it. A group is made up of many diverse individuals who have diverse thoughts. I would say for me, I am a very distinct individual who is very community-minded, that talks about issues on a very ground-level basis and grassroots. Even when people speak, they say, “Wow. You’re not very partisan.” And I say, “Yeah, I just talk about parts that matter: schools, laws, facilities, getting Hawaiians in homes.” And none of that has to do with the party, it all has to do with the necessity of our government doing its job to help facilitate a better life for the people of Hawaii. I don’t know where I fall on the spectrum; people might call me a moderate, but again, it’s all about perspective. For some people I’m too right-wing; for some people, I’m a screaming liberal.

B+C: What advice would you give to women who are interested in running for office?

Tupola: I would say check your motives. If your motive is to serve the people and better the community, then do it. If you have the motive to see positive change and you can envision that, get involved. But I would never ever advise anyone to get involved in politics if you’re looking for a career or looking for a powerful position. My main concern with people that I work with is if you have the real desire to love the people you serve and put yourself aside, and do what the people need and ask those real questions — that’s why you should get into office. If you have any other motives, just check your motives, because it is no joke to run for office. Once you get in, you need to be ready to have hundreds of thousands of people pick apart every idea you’ve ever had in your life. If that motive or drive isn’t pure or centered on the people you serve, you will get burned out for sure.

B+C: How can people support your run?

Tupola: I have a website at votetupola.com. We raise money every day, so you can donate. If you want to volunteer, even if you don’t live in the state, we have people from out of state who help all the time. They do calling, they do social media posting. And lastly, if you are in the state of Hawaii, the best thing you can do to help me is you can vote for me.

(Design by Yising Chou/B+C)

I'll admit out of the many teen dramas I've consumed, Outer Banks is one of the most ridiculous. But the insanity surrounding the plot is half the reason it's enjoyable! John B. wrestling an alligator with his bare hands? Kiara getting kidnapped then making a daring escape in her PJ's? John B. and Sarah getting married (kind of) by the power of "the sky, the stars, and the sea" after escaping the SBI?

Considering my favorite fan theory for the future is that Madelyn Cline's Sarah and Rudy Pankow's JJ learn they're secret siblings, I know the crazy train isn't slowing down anytime soon. I took to Reddit to find the wildest Outer Bankshot takes and I was not disappointed. Keep reading to see if you agree with any!

JJ and Kiara Never Should Have Happened

Image via Netflix

While JJ and Kiara is one of the most popular ships on the show, a lot of Outer Banks fans think the "no Pogue-on-Pogue macking" rule from the pilot should have stayed in effect. The individual romances between Kiara and JJ, John B., and Pope make the story really messy, and the fact the show writes Kiara to be with all three of them in the span of three years gives a lot of viewers the ick.

I'll be team #Jiara forever (and literally screamed when The Backseat Lovers' "Kilby Girl" started playing during the motorcycle ride in season 3), but I'll say it would incredibly compelling to see a friend group take care of each other as much as the Pogues do without ever crossing over into romantic territory. That's found family, after all!

Pope Should Have Ditched The Treasure Hunt

Image via Netflix

One Reddit user is convinced that "Pope should’ve focused on his future in school instead of giving everything up to search for treasure." And TBH, I totally agree.

In season 1, Pope has a breakthrough about the hidden treasure in the middle of his scholarship interview. He ditches the scholarship committee to tell the rest of the Pogues, throwing away a crazy educational opportunity. Pope beats himself up for it, and his parents definitely aren't pleased, but at least it meant he got to stay in the show instead of leaving for college, which leads me to...

Outer Banks Should Have Started With The Pogues In Their 20s

Image via Netflix

As one of the only people alive who loves the post-time jump One Tree Hill, I would have loved to see OBX start off with the characters in their 20s (although it looks like that's where Outer Banks season 4 will pick up!). This would eliminate SO MANY problems from the jump because the Pogues wouldn't have to worry about missing school, they'd be more self-sufficient, and instead of being the same old high school drama, it could have provided a commentary on figuring out life in your 20s the same way Friends did.

Rafe Shouldn't Have Any Kind Of Redemption Arc In Outer Banks Season 4

Image via Netflix

Drew Starkey the man that you are. According to one Reddit user, "Rafe should not have a love interest or a redemption arc" like we see in season 3. We spent all of season 1 and season 2 establishing that Rafe (played by Drew) would do anything it took to get what he wanted (including one successful murder and two other attempts?!). He shows next to no remorse for his actions, and exploring his literal psychopathic tendencies would take the show to a whole new level.

Big John Should Never Have Returned

Image via Netflix

John B.'s dad's disappearance is the catalyst for the Pogues' journey at the beginning of Outer Banks, and Big John's return means the story feels somewhat repetitive in the third season, and it undoes a lot of the growth we've seen from John B. Plus, Big John is just SO chaotic, selfish, and dramatic. If he had truly died in season 1, we could have seen John B. wrestle with that finality, and how to cope with loss in the face of finding the treasure and falling in love with Sarah.

And Finally, Outer Banks Should Have Ended After Season 1

Image via Netflix

Outer Banks season 1 was exactly what we needed at the height of the pandemic. It was escapist — both in terms of the beach vacation vibes, but also because the '00s aesthetic took us right back to simpler times — and it had such a wonderfully resolved finale that some fans think nothing has matched it.

Do you agree with any of these Outer Banks opinions? I'm such a romance fan, I don't know what I'd do if the show didn't have JJ and Kiara get together! Check out all the best New TV Shows coming this year for more.

Lead image via Netflix

Women Who Run highlights female political candidates on both sides of the aisle who are poised to change the face of local, state, and federal government for the better.

Cindy Polo, the Democratic candidate running to represent Florida’s 103rd District in the state senate, is trying to bring back a “personal touch” to politics.

“When we speak to the press, speak to volunteers, I want it to be me they’re hearing from,” she says. “That personal touch is something I think politics has been missing. I don’t have paid staff, or a huge budget where I can have 20 people do things for me. I’m involved in all parts of the campaign.”

Over the past several months, Polo has gone from being a stay-at-home mom to an almost-three-year-old son to a candidate in a competitive race to flip her state senate seat. Polo filed to run the day after testifying before the state senate about a bill to arm Florida teachers, the week after the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland.

Watching Parkland unfold just miles from her home, and watching as a young mother, was critical to Polo’s decision to run for office. But she also thinks Parkland is one — certainly big — part of a broader movement, of everyday people wanting to be “part of that change and not just expecting someone else to do it for you.” And it doesn’t matter how many times you’re turned away by people in power at first: “Eventually, it’s not just one person knocking on that door, it’s 10 of us. And then it’s not 10, it’s 100 of us,” she says.

Polo is one of not just 100, but thousands of women across the country galvanized to run for office up and down the ballot this year. And she hopes these numbers are just a glimpse of the future.

“The press is labeling this the ‘Year of the Woman,’ and I think every year should be,” she says. “It shouldn’t end with whatever the results are in November. November 7, a whole new cycle begins, and we have to keep at it until we feel we have a voice and people are listening to us, until we get people who sound like us and look like us in office.”

B+C: What inspired you to run for office?

Polo: I like to say the Marjory Stoneman Douglas tragedy is what got me off the couch, but it’s essentially everything since the general election, and my feeling that I didn’t do enough for the general election. I voted, but I feel that’s the bare minimum, and personally, I don’t feel we’re living in a time where the bare minimum cuts it. Everything was one thing after another, and then Parkland felt like that defining moment where, as a mom, I felt I needed to do much more.

After a brief encounter with the state senators here in Florida after the senate hearing, and seeing the inefficiency and politics being played out shortly after the tragedy, that started the momentum. I had an opportunity to speak in front of the senate, and had a two-minute speech discussing the bill they were debating. The main portion of it was putting guns in teachers’ hands, and during my speech I called out the NRA, and the reaction to my speech is what caused me to file to run shortly after. I realized we have a voice, and if we do our best to hold people accountable, part of that is stepping in where we see a gap.

At the time, the Republican in our district was running unopposed, and I just thought, with everything happening in our country, I couldn’t live with myself knowing he would just be given a public office without ever having to explain or defend his position to the community he represents. That was the last straw.

B+C: What does a day on the campaign trail look like for you?

Polo: There’s no two days that are alike. I have a soon-to-be three-year-old, and so I’ve made an attempt to make sure the day starts and ends with him, making sure that he’s settled, whether he’s taken care of with my parents or with me. I really need to have that time with him in the morning, because I don’t know what the rest of the day is going to look like.

Now toward the end, as we’ve had a steady flow of volunteers, and a steady flow of help, the day looks a little more structured. At least I know there may be an event in the evening, and during the day, it’s making calls to donors, returning emails, sometimes putting out a fire that may have started. But really, no two days are alike. You’re just running forward with your eye on the finish line, just trying to get through that day.

I attempt to finish the day with my son. That’s becoming more scarce, just because meetings can run late, or there’s a last-minute community event. You’re just kind of everywhere. On grassroots campaigns, it’s exhausting, but it’s just so cool to have your hand in everything. It’s my name, my personality, my family out there, and I take ownership.

B+C: What are the issues you’d focus on if elected?

Polo: There’s so many, and fortunately and unfortunately, there’s so many concerns our community has — many of which have been ignored by current elected officials. But I would say in District 103, specifically, we have broad issues like gun control and education, issues that are top of mind as we aren’t very far from Parkland.

There’s a lot of debate in Florida about education and traditional public schools vs. charter schools and the funding, and our public schools are seeing less and less funding. Not only seeing less funding for students, but the state is ranked 45 in the nation in teacher salaries.

And an issue specific to 103 is a mine-blasting issue, as the blasting levels as well as the frequency have increased. These manmade explosions are creating earthquakes in our district and damaging homes, so there’s cracks in walls and foundations, roofs are separating — it’s a very serious issue that elected officials currently representing the area have never spoken about. It’s been more of a citizens’ concern. None of our representatives are talking about it, and this issue is much bigger than any of them would claim.

B+C: What are some of the challenges, if any, that you’ve faced transitioning into campaign mode from being a stay-at-home mom?

Polo: I think some of the challenges I face aren’t necessarily unique to being a mom, as all candidates would agree there just isn’t enough time in the day to do everything that comes up. For me specifically, other than time and just trying to balance being a mom, because I deal with that guilt of sort of being away, not being present for every single bedtime story, it’s also that even though I’m running as a Democrat with a progressive platform, our party itself is pretty traditional. So that said, the barriers to entry to the world of campaigning and the world of public office are pretty high. Especially for individuals who don’t come from that pedigree or money, financing a campaign is what keeps me up at night.

All of the help you need — administrative help, communication with constituents — it’s going to cost in some sort of way. So trying to fundraise while running a campaign completely by yourself without consultants, and trying to balance personal relationships, I think, is the most challenging. Calling to ask for money, you’re asking in your own name, for yourself, and that by far is the biggest challenge, especially for first-time candidates.

B+C: Did you feel a change in your community after the Parkland shooting? If so, how would you describe it?

Polo: There is a movement just overall, and Parkland is the most emotional part of this because of the consequences and product of what happened. But the movement is everything: not just one thing, not just gun control and school shootings and environmental concerns. It’s all of it.

The movement now is not just anger: It’s a push to be involved, to be part of that change and not just expecting someone else to do it for you. And I’m inspired because I see that everywhere, and I’m inspired because I think the Stoneman Douglas students led that, where being deeply affected by an issue, instead of pleading with someone else to resolve it, they went ahead and took action into their own hands.

I think that that spreads across demographics, age — it’s something we all need to be reminded of. If we don’t like and don’t accept the direction in which we’re moving, we can be an active participant in it. We don’t have to just wait for an election result; we can take to the streets, start organizations, join local groups. We can have an active part in changing things. I think students have reminded us of what our country really stands for, that you’re supposed to make your voice heard. If they ignore you the first time, you come back stronger, more united, louder, until it gets to the point that they can’t ignore you.

And with moms especially, we’re seeing so many things as women that we need to take an active role in. We can’t just expect other people to fix things for us, we have to be part of the system in order to change and disrupt it. We need to be part of it to call them out, and really shine a spotlight on all of these issues that affect us.

I know you asked about Parkland, and I think that just ties in to everything. That those students took their pain and anger and didn’t dwell in it, or sit and mope. They decided to take action. And I think that’s inspired everyone else younger or older to follow their example and lead.

B+C: What’s your advice for young women who may be inspired by you to get involved in politics or their communities for the first time?

Polo: My first piece of advice is, don’t overthink it, just do it. You’re going to figure it out. We don’t get into things just because we’re already experts at it; sometimes you have to learn along the way. And if you have a passion for it, you just need to do it, whether you’re running for office yourself or helping others run for office. But what I say is, just get up and do it. It doesn’t matter if you don’t get it right the first time around. I mess up 20 times a day and that’s being conservative. You dust yourself off, and the next day, you attempt to be better.

And speaking long-term, I’d say learn from other people who have run for office, whether they won or lost. There’s little nuggets of information that there’s no handbook for. But also, if there’s nothing that appeals to you right now, if there are organizations you don’t completely agree with, then create your own. You’d be surprised. Some of these organizations, as much exposure as they get, you’d think they have a huge member base, but some of them don’t. They use whatever assets they have to shine a spotlight on whatever issue it is they care about.

And of course, start building your network and list of allies you can trust. No matter what side of the aisle you’re on, this is not a simple world. I’ve only been in it for a few months, and it’s complicated. Things can feel like they’re at a stand-still. You need a tough-skin, and I don’t mean not to cry or change who you are, but you need to build up tolerance and patience and persistence. Sometimes the door doesn’t open for you, no matter how loudly you knock. It doesn’t mean you don’t come back the next day and keep knocking at it.

Overall, you need to be persistent, and find something to fight for, because there’s a long list. There’s not just one issue we’re facing, especially for young women nowadays. Find that one that speaks to you, that gets you worked up, and choose to do something about it. Because there is no action that’s too small. As long as you go forward with something, you’re making an impact, whether you see it immediately or not.

(Design by Yising Chou/B+C)

Mariska Hargitay is the woman of the hour anywhere she goes, with her iconic Law & Order: SVUrole as Olivia Benson under her belt for the last 25 years. The character is an absolute advocate to women — and assault victims of any gender — through her words, actions, and powerful convictions of each perpetrator on the show. She takes great care with her victims and pursues perpetrators with fervor, and slowly as you watch the show..the line blurs between Olivia and Mariska.

This isn't anything new — just recently Mariska literally stopped production on the show to help a child (who mistook her for an actual police officer) find her mom. It's just who Mariska is. She walks the walk and talks the talk — including during her speech at Variety's Power of Women's Power of Women event.

Image via NBC Universal

As a Power of Women honoree, Mariska was recognized in regards to her work as an advocate for sexual assault survivors. She took the stage and used her platform to discuss rape and assault conviction reversals, shining a light on the recent overturned ruling in Harvey Weinstein's landmark NYC case. Here's what she said:

Today I want to talk about reversing convictions, and more specifically I want to talk to you about how impossible it is to reverse mine. It’s impossible to reverse my conviction that survivors matter. It is impossible to reverse my conviction that what happens to us matters, and that our society must respond to survivors with a more a compassionate, holistically, deeper, and more nuanced understanding of what healing means.

It is impossible to reverse my conviction that after a trauma, survivors can reclaim lives of hope, of possibility, of audacious risk, beautiful intimacy, and glorious, glorious abundant joy. And I stand before you as evidence of that statement.

It is impossible to reverse my conviction that we must listen to survivors as experts on what justice means. It is extraordinary how little their voices are consulted, let alone incorporated, in the process of deciding how to repair harm. Justice is not a one-size-fits-all journey.

It is impossible to reverse my conviction that patriarchal impunity has to end. Patriarchal impunity is when a male-dominated system exempts perpetrators from punishment. Studies show that only 20% of all rape cases in the U.S. are reported to the police, and that between 5 and 0% of all rapes result in a guilty plea or a conviction. So why do 80% of victims not report? Because they're met with a system that grants impunity to perpetrators; a system that blames victims; a system that accepts only those victims who are experienced as "real" rape; a system that completely misunderstands the neurobiology of trauma, which causes behavior in women that doesn't fit the picture of how a "real victim" would act.

Is that change needed that victims should just pull themselves together? Just buck up and report anyway? No. No, it's the system that receives them that needs to change

It is impossible to reverse my conviction — and the conviction of my extraordinary team, The Joyful Heart — that the backlog of untested rape kits can be brought to zero; that the testing of all new kits must be mandated; that we need a statewide kit tracking system; and that survivors have the right to access the status of their kits.

It is impossible to reverse my conviction that grammar — yes, grammar — that we use when we speak about rape must change. In the sentence, "A woman is raped," there's a crime and there's a victim, but there's no perpetrator. Where's the perpetrator? Where is he? Statistically, as we know, most likely he's walking free. He's so free that he doesn't even appear in the language about the crime that he committed. Is that not extraordinary? It's extraordinary that in the very grammar, the perpetrator goes free. Reintroducing perpetrators in the language of rape will make some very unwieldy grammar, but that's the nature of change. It's unwieldy, it's messy, it's uncomfortable, but it's necessary.

Image via NBC Universal

Hargitay continued on in her prolific speech to describe that rape shouldn't be considered a "crime of passion" because it's "not simply the next step in the trajectory of his passion" when a man takes a consensual hookup too far and assaults a woman against her will. She stated that it's "an exercise of power," doubling down that the language we use is important.

The speech went on to address that rape is both about power and control, as a "construct" that was "built, and assembled, and reinforced over time." She noted that there are people with these positions of power — and she specifically called out those in the entertainment industry — that could make a difference and aligned themselves to victims and survivors.

After this and some other remarks, Hargitay specifically called out the Weinstein conviction reversal. She said:

I do want to say something about the Harvey Weinstein conviction, specifically about the reason that it was overturned: too many women's voices. Too many women's voices were allowed to speak. Hallelujah! Amen! I can't imagine anything more beautiful than that. The Daily podcast episode talked about how it was so risky for the prosecution to have that many women testify. Risky to let women speak? You're damn right it is!

Too many women speaking brings change. Too many women speaking shakes the establishment. Too many women means we get listened to more, and people might actually hear what we have to say. Look what happened when women started saying just two words, right? Me too — just as an example — a tidal wave of change. Me too.

And then of course, there was the response: the Me Too Movement. The backlash. The examination of whether the changes that have come are lasting, or are even positive. Of course there's a backlash! What did they expect? For women to speak repeatedly, loudly, together, with a purpose — for there to be no backlash? The backlash is evidence of how powerful those voices were, how powerful those voices ARE.

Watch Mariska Hargitay's Full Speech Here

www.youtube.com

Mariska Hargitay's Gets Emotional as She Thanks Her Support System and the Women Around Her

Turns out that your TV heroes really can be your IRL heroes after all. Long live Olivia Benson! Long live Mariska Hargitay!

Follow us on Facebook for more celebrity and pop culture news.

Header image via NBC Universal

After Emily in Paris season 3 dropped on Netflix in December of 2022, we were hoping to get the fourth installment of the hit show in 2023. But production halted when the WGA writers' strike, then the SAG-AFTRA actors' strike went to affect, and our beloved cast and crew campaigned for better wages and industry protection. But with the end of the writers' strike, and new SAG negotiations, Emily in Paris season 4 finally began production in February 2024 — and I can already tell you there's sure to be plenty of drama and French fashion this time around.

Not only will we see Emily in Paris (see what I did there?!) but she's also pulling an Audrey Hepburn and taking a little Roman Holiday. That's right — our favorite Parisians are heading to Italy! If that doesn't sound like a dreamy comfort show then I don't know what does. Here's everything we know about the upcoming season of your favorite TV brain candy!!

Is Emily in Paris season 4 coming soon?

Image via Lily Collins/Instagram

Via Variety, Emily in Paris season 4 began production in Paris the week of January 15! "Did someone say Saison Quatre?!" Lily Collins says in her Instagram post announcing production. "Finally reunited with my @emilyinparis fam back in Paris and it feels so good. Although, I may need to brush up on my selfie skills for Emily’s sake…"

Now the wait is over! According to the official announcementfor Emily in Paris, we know part one drops on Netflix August 15, followed by part 2 on September 12. I've been impatiently waiting for this considering we didn't know how filming would be impacted by things like the WGA writers strike!

Is Emily in Paris filmed in Paris?

Image via Lily Collins/Instagram

Yes, Emily in Paris is filmed on location in Paris! We got our first look at Emily in Paris season 4 when Lily Collins and Ashley Park were seen filming in the City of Love (via Daily Mail). The costumes for the series are still as bold and bright as ever, with Ashley's Mindy wearing cobalt and metallic boots, and Lily's Emily dressed head-to-toe in lemon yellow. I can't wait to see what these best friends get up to this season! Check out our Paris travel recommendations to live out your own Emily in Paris dreams ;).

On April 27, Lily Collins confirmed Emily in Paris season 4 had wrapped its France shoot and that the cast & crew have swapped the City of Love for the Eternal City! "When you’re the first ones on the dance floor at the Paris wrap party. Next stop: Rome!" she says on Instagram. Late spring is literally the perfect time to film in Italy and I just know this season is going to give me more wanderlust than ever before. I need gelato!

What's Emily In Paris season 4 about?

Image via Netflix

Season 3 left us with a huge cliffhanger: Alfie breaks up with Emily, Camille learns she's pregnant with Gabriel's baby, Benoit's "Mon Soleil" has been chosen for the Eurovision Song Contest, and Emily and Gabriel realize they've been in love with each other the whole time. Whew.

Emily in Paris season 4 will have a ton of cliffhangers to bring full circle, and a bunch of damage that all the characters need to heal. We know from the Netflix TUDUM fan event that we might also see Emily have to deal with an ultimatum head-on, as well as an unexpected twist. Plus, it looks like she's heading on a "Roman holiday," according to lead actress Lily Collins. We'll take any nod to an Audrey Hepburn movie, please and thank you!

Is Alfie coming back in season 4 of Emily in Paris?

Image via Netflix

We don't have OFFICIAL word on whether Alfie (played by Lucien Laviscount) will return for Emily in Paris season 4, but we're hoping for his sake that he gets some closure. Lucien wants to come back as well! "[The dream is] to keep this gravy train going and just to kind of really live in this world a little bit longer," he says in an interview with Elle. " The writers on the show and the creators behind it and everyone that comes into contact with it is so amazing and fantastic. Their minds [have] way, way, way, way surpassed mine. So, yeah. I’ll let them do their thing.”

Who else is in the Emily in Paris season 4 cast?

Image via Netflix

We can expect the rest of the cast — Lily Collins as Emily, Lucas Bravo as Gabriel, Ashley Park as Mindy, Camille Razat as Camille, Philippine Leroy-Beaulieu as Sylvie, Samuel Arnold as Julian, and Bruno Gouery as Luc — to return.

Will there be a season 5 of Emily in Paris?

Image via Marie Etchegoyen/Netflix

It looks like Emily in Paris season 4 will not be the final season, according to creator Darren Star. “There’s a lot more story to tell here and we’re not wrapping things up anytime soon,” Star tells Elle. “And also hopefully season four isn’t the end either. I feel like we’re all creatively feeling like we’re in the middle of something not heading towards the end.”

Darren also told Deadline season 4 is "not necessarily conceived as a final chapter. I think like every other show, it’s a rich ensemble. There’s no end in sight until everybody feels like it’s time to end. And I don’t think this show is limited by a number of seasons, I think it’s limited by everybody’s enthusiasm and excitement about doing it and telling stories about these characters."

We'll take as many seasons of Emily in Paris as they'll give us!!

What has the cast said about Emily in Paris season 4?

Image via Marie Etchegoyen/Netflix

Lucas Bravo told People he's excited for a coming-of-age for Gabriel. "When you start a character, then there's a year where you experience the world and you mature, you become another person and you come back and it's exactly the day you left off," he says. "I'm happy that in season four I'll be able to bring more of what I became and what I've experienced in the past four years."

Even though Lily Collins is now an executive producer, she doesn't want to know TOO much about the future of the show. “Darren and I speak, on occasion, about where he’s thinking of going, but he also doesn’t wanna spoil too much for me because there is a fine line,” she tells Collider. “I don’t wanna know everything because I want to be led with the writing, but I am also curious because, as a producer wanting to celebrate the other characters, I’m very curious to see what their trajectories are."

What happened at the end of Emily in Paris season 3?

Image via Netflix

To be fully prepared for Emily in Paris season 4, it's important to remember just what happened during season 3! The junior season was a bumpy ride for Emily, and it ends with the craziest finale yet. After Camille and Gabriel decide to get married, Camille stops the wedding, saying she knows Gabriel is in love with Emily instead of her. This declaration leads Alfie to break up with our leading lady because he refuses to be her second choice (and honestly, I respect it). That's not the only shocker because Camille also reveals that she's pregnant with Gabriel's child, which comes as a surprise to everyone. Meanwhile, Mindy learns Benoit has submitted a song (specifically "Mon Soleil") to the Eurovision Song Contest and Laurent has his heart set on opening a club in Paris.

Are you excited for Emily in Paris Season 4? Give us your craziest theory in the comments, and check out our Facebook for more pop culture news. Read up on how This Emily In Paris Theory Could Be Why Emily And Gabriel Aren’t Together (Yet).

Lead image via Netflix.

This post has been updated.