In a ruling late last week, a federal judge put a hold on President Trump鈥檚 proposed transgender military ban for a third time, citing the fact that the administration鈥檚 most recent attempt was too similar to its first proposal. This means that the original injunctions against the ban must stand.

In March, the president proposed a revised ban that would force transgender people to serve in the military under the gender they were assigned at birth, arguing that this change allows transgender people to serve in the military without challenging the constitutional issues that may have arisen out of an outright ban. But US District Judge Marsha Pechman ruled late Friday that the court didn鈥檛 agree with the president鈥檚 assessment.

鈥淭he Court also rules that, because transgender people have long been subjected to systemic oppression and forced to live in silence, they are a protected class,鈥聽Judge Pechman wrote in her ruling. 鈥淭herefore, any attempt to exclude them from military service will be looked at with the highest level of care, and will be subject to the Court鈥檚 鈥榮trict scrutiny.'鈥

Judge Pechman also said in her ruling that forcing transgender people to serve with the outward appearance of the gender they were assigned at birth doesn鈥檛 constitute 鈥榦pen鈥 service, meaning that the proposed allowance announced in March is essentially no different than the original outright ban.

In 2016, the Obama administration decided to clarify official policies regarding transgender service people with the 鈥淥pen Service Directive,鈥 an order that bans exclusion or discrimination against servicemen and women based on their transgender status. The 2016 directive also ensures medical treatments and surgeries related to transition are being funded.

At the time of President Trump鈥檚 first order in 2017, Judge Pechman was one of four judges to issue injunctions against the administration鈥檚 original ban after a number of current and aspiring transgender service members and civil rights organizations like the Human Rights Campaign filed a lawsuit to challenge it.

The lawsuit, filed in part by LGBTQ+ advocacy groups Lambda Legal and OutServe-SLDN argues that the ban violates transgender people鈥檚 First Amendment rights. In a joint statement released after Judge Pechman filed her ruling, the legal bodies said they feel strongly that justice will prevail in this case and that they applauded Judge Pechman鈥檚 ruling.

(Photo by Sandy Huffaker/Getty Images)