Today is a sad day in the history of the internet. Under the lead of FCC Chair Ajit Pai, Americans lost our access to a free and open internet. Republican lawmakers (like Pai, who was appointed to his role by the president earlier this year) have pushed for a net neutrality repeal, and the repeal was made official Thursday afternoon. But two women, including former acting chair and current Commissioner, Mignon L. Clyburn, and fellow Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, are sharing their dissent to the law ahead of the vote.

During opening statements today, Clyburn gave a fiery plea, telling her colleagues at the commission, 鈥淚 dissent. I dissent from this fiercely spun, legally lightweight, consumer-harming, corporate-enabling Destroying Internet Freedom Order.鈥

鈥淚 dissent, because I am among the millions who are outraged. Outraged, because the FCC pulls its own teeth, abdicating responsibility to protect the nation鈥檚 broadband consumers,鈥 Clyburn fumed. 鈥淲hy are we witnessing such an unprecedented groundswell of public support, for keeping the 2015 net neutrality protections in place? Because the public can plainly see, that a soon-to-be-toothless FCC, is handing the keys to the internet 鈥 the internet, one of the most remarkable, empowering, enabling inventions of our lifetime 鈥 over to a handful of multi-billion dollar corporations. And if past is prologue, those very same broadband internet service providers, that the majority says you should trust to do right by you, will put profits and shareholder returns above, what is best for you.鈥

Clyburn went on in her statement to remind her colleagues at the Commission that their jobs are to do what is best for the nation, not work toward what she believes are the demands of special interest groups and big corporations looking to do away with rules that would protect customers over profit. She also and specifically called out Pai and those who have not bothered to listen to those Americans asking them to cancel this vote.

鈥淲e have heard story after story of what net neutrality means to consumers and small businesses from places as diverse as Los Angeles鈥 Skid Row and Marietta, Ohio. I hold in my hand letters that plead with the FCC to keep our net neutrality rules in place, but what is striking and in keeping with the new norm, despite the millions of comments, letters, and calls received, this Order cites not even one. That speaks volumes about the direction the FCC is heading. That speaks volumes about just who is being heard.鈥

Clyburn finally viciously called to question whether her GOP colleagues fully understand what they are doing, knowing that their order to repeal the net neutrality law of 2015 flies in the face of the very values their office was created to uphold.

鈥淚t is abundantly clear why we see so much bad process with this item: because the fix was already in,鈥 she said in her statement.

While many are applauding Clyburn鈥檚 impassioned plea, some are pointing out that her boss, Chairman Pai 鈥渓aughed鈥 in the face of Clyburn at the end of her statement.

Commissioner Rosenworcel, who penned a passionate op-ed for the LA Times in defense of a free and open internet, also spoke in dissent shortly before Thursday鈥檚 vote.

鈥淭his is not good,鈥 said Rosenworcel. 鈥淣ot good for consumers, not good for businesses, not good for anyone who connects and creates online.鈥

She went on: 鈥淚 dissent from the corrupt process that has brought us to this point. And I dissent from the contempt this agency has shown our citizens in pursuing this path today.鈥

Following the vote, Commissioner Rosenworcel did not back down. 鈥淸T]his is not over,鈥 she tweeted. 鈥淚鈥檓 not stopping here or now鈥揳nd neither should you. Let鈥檚 keep up the fight. Let鈥檚 keep raising a ruckus. The future depends on it.鈥

Have you been following the net neutrality drama? Let us know @BritandCo!

(Photos via Larry French/Getty Images for Common Sense Media + Chip Somodevilia/Getty)