This Brand Got into Hot Water for Its Refugee Dress
This is one instance in which you’d hope brands might think twice before sending their merch out into the world. In our current rocky political climate, a Brooklyn store is catching heat for an insensitively named a dress.
Co-founder Mari Gustafson noted that when they named the style 10 years ago, it was supposed to start a discussion. She explained, “We named the dress in 2007 when we could not see ourselves escaping the reality of a global economy spinning out of control. We feel that it is important to keep these issues within public discourse… We could have named the dress anything we wanted but then we wouldn’t be having this discussion.”
But the discussion that’s happening doesn’t exactly seem like what the brand may have hoped for, and Twitter users aren’t buying the name-as-conversation-starter story.
— Marilyn Bastedo (@m_bastedo) August 3, 2017
— Grace Wyld (@GraceWyld) August 2, 2017
— Arousa Naqvi (@veiledevolution) August 1, 2017
/UZINYC, what are they thinking? Wouldn't something like, AK47NYC be more appropriate? NY Cos trying to make a dollar off of refugees. sad
— FRO (@Blackbuck004) August 3, 2017
Gustafson still stands by the brand’s naming decision. She said in a non-apology, “The language we have used to describe our fabric is common within the fabric industry, it in no way references human beings.” She acknowledged the backlash by saying, “We understand that we have unintentionally offended some people with whom we share the same concerns, but in that process we have also been able to amplify our shared message.”
However, since the controversy broke, the brand has since changed the style name to the Oxford Dress.
What do you think of the latest clothing controversy? Let us know which retail gaffe is your most memorable @BritandCo!
(h/t Refinery29; photos via UZI NYC)