There鈥檚 nothing quite as satisfying as snagging a sweet buy 鈥 except maybe knowing that you have the option to change your mind if you decide your new threads may not be for you after all. A great return policy can really make or break any shopping experience, and major retailers, such as Forever 21 and Amazon, have been working hard in recent months to make them as fret-free as possible. L. L. Bean, however, is being forced to tighten the reigns on its lifetime returns policy, which has been in place for 106 years, after its customers began pushing it to extremes.

As of February 9, customers will no longer have the ability to bring back any item

indefinitely

in exchange for a new version of the same item, 鈥渢he most

currently available,鈥 or a store gift card for its last known sale price. The store will now only accept returns if they were bought within the past 12 months (or have a manufacturing defect) and will require a valid proof of purchase.

Taking to

to share the official announcement with fans, L.L.Bean Executive Chairman Shawn O. Gorman (whose great-grandfather founded the brand) explained that, 鈥渋ncreasingly, a small, but growing number of customers has been interpreting our guarantee well beyond its original intent. Some view it as a lifetime product replacement program, expecting refunds for heavily worn products used over many years. Others seek refunds for products that have been purchased through third parties, such as at yard sales.鈥

Our favorite color is plaid. #BeanOutsider (馃摲: @mono1984)

A post shared by L.L.Bean (@llbean) on

L.L. Bean President and CEO Stephen Smith echoed the sentiment, saying that the sudden change was caused by the 15 percent of shoppers trying to abuse the system by attempting to return completely worn-out items or pieces they simply have outgrown or no longer like. 鈥淲hat we have seen, and it has come to the point where we had to act upon it, is a small but growing group of customers who are interpreting the guarantee as a lifetime product replacement program, and that was never its intent,鈥 he told the Portland Press Herald.

He also gave the outlet instances of the abuse in question, sharing photos of items people have returned citing 鈥渜uality dissatisfaction,鈥 including old slippers that were falling apart due to non-stop use and a kids鈥 ski jacket with no visible damage and three ski tickets still attached to its zippers.

Still, you鈥檙e not totally SOL if an issue arises past the one-year-deadline, with Gorman adding, 鈥渁fter one year, we will work with our customers to reach a fair solution if a product is defective in any way.鈥

While there was a bit of backlash to be sure, with some citing the initial policy as major incentive for shopping, many seemed supportive of the change, noting that the company should not be held responsible for people abusing the system.

What do you think of L. L. Bean鈥檚 new policy? Tweet us @BritandCo.

(Photos via L.L. Bean)